2020 Showcase

Myth-busting DPDK in 2020

Revealed: the past, present, and future of the most popular data plane development kit in the world.

This report and collection of videos, produced by AvidThink and Converge! Network Digest, was commissioned by the Linux Foundation. It outlines the critical role played by DPDK in the evolution of networking infrastructure, while dispelling a number of myths and misconceptions about the technology.
Analysis by AvidThink

What the 2020 DPDK myth-busting series finds

Across ten short segments, engineers from ZTE, Intel, Microsoft, Arm, NTT, the Linux Foundation, and Mellanox (NVIDIA) join host Jim St. Leger to dismantle common misconceptions about DPDK, and the cross-vendor lineup itself is the message: DPDK is broader, more open, and more versatile than assumed.

  1. A genuinely multi-vendor community

    Arm's Honnappa Nagarahalli tackles the myth that Intel controls DPDK, while Microsoft's Harini Ramakrishnan counters that it is a closed community, showing contributors spanning Intel, Arm, Microsoft, ZTE, and NTT.

  2. Beyond hardware and the dataplane

    Intel's Edwin Verplanke rebuts the idea that DPDK is just for hardware, and Mellanox (NVIDIA)'s Thomas Monjalon, with the Linux Foundation's Trishan de Lanerolle, rejects the framing that DPDK is a software dataplane only.

  3. Not confined to telcos

    NTT's Yasufumi Ogawa disputes the notion that DPDK is only for telcos, reinforcing the series' theme of broad applicability across industries beyond carrier networks.

  4. Container-ready, coexists with SmartNICs

    Intel's Muthurajan Jayakumar addresses the claim that DPDK is not for containers, while Intel's Georgii Tkachuk takes on fears that SmartNICs will kill DPDK.

  5. Distinct from Linux, still evolving

    The Linux Foundation's Jill Lovato separates DPDK from the myth that it is Linux, and ZTE's Wang Yong counters the idea that DPDK is code complete, signaling ongoing development.

Download the full report →

Highlights from industry thought leaders

Video interviews

DPDK Project

Myth #10: DPDK is code complete

  • ZTE hardware engineer Wang Yong takes on the myth that DPDK is code complete.
Abstract

Wang Yong, Hardware Engineer at ZTE, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #9: DPDK is just for hardware

  • Intel solution architect Edwin Verplanke rebuts the idea that DPDK is just for hardware.
Abstract

Edwin Verplanke, Solution Architect at Intel, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #8: DPDK is a closed community

  • Microsoft's Harini Ramakrishnan counters the myth that DPDK is a closed community.
Abstract

Harini Ramakrishnan, Program Manager II at Microsoft, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #7: SmartNICS will kill DPDK

  • Intel performance engineer Georgii Tkachuk addresses whether SmartNICs will kill DPDK.
Abstract

Georgii Tkachuk, Performance Engineer at Intel, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #6: Intel controls DPDK

  • Arm principal software engineer Honnappa Nagarahalli challenges the notion that Intel controls DPDK.
Abstract

Honnappa Nagarahalli, Principal Software Engineer at Arm, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #5: DPDK is only for telcos

  • NTT Service System Lab's Yasufumi Ogawa disputes the myth that DPDK is only for telcos.
Abstract

Yasufumi Ogawa, Research Engineer at NTT Service System Lab, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #4: DPDK is not green

  • Intel software engineer Jingjing Wu takes on the claim that DPDK is not green.
Abstract

Jingjing Wu, Software Engineer at Intel, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #3: DPDK is Linux

  • The Linux Foundation's Jill Lovato separates DPDK from the myth that it is Linux.
Abstract

Jill Lovato, Senior Manager, Communications at the Linux Foundation, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #2: DPDK is not for containers

  • Intel's Muthurajan Jayakumar rebuts the myth that DPDK is not for containers.
Abstract

Muthurajan Jayakumar “M Jay,” Technical Marketing Engineer at Intel, joins Jim St. Leger.

DPDK Project

Myth #1: DPDK is software dataplane only

  • Mellanox (NVIDIA)'s Thomas Monjalon and the Linux Foundation's Trishan de Lanerolle debunk DPDK as software-dataplane-only.
Abstract

Trishan de Lanerolle, Technical Program Manager at the Linux Foundation, joins Thomas Monjalon, Engineer at Mellanox (NVIDIA).

With the recent advent of SmartNICs, some in the industry had predicted the demise of DPDK. However, if anything, DPDK has evolved and work on it has accelerated.
Download the Full Report

By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.